|
The end of the endgame that was no endgame |
|
|
|
|
Written by Sciurus
|
|
Tuesday, 09 May 2006 |
|
A couple of weeks ago I wrote about an endgame in one of my correspondence chess games at ChessWorld.
From the comments to that post, I learned that my position at that time
should have been filed under middlegame and not endgame. The [ln:sciurus vs. crosspein 0-1 'game} just finished with a loss for me: I gave my opponent the chance to play a
mate-in-three combination. This did not stop me from winning the tournament,
though.
I wrote in the previous post on "endgame" study that I should start some kind of basic endgame
study. I actually started reading "Pandolfini's
Endgame Course" by Bruce Pandolfini. Right now, I am working through
the chapter on minor pieces vs. a lone king. The problems such as mates in
four are not very complicated. In fact, I would probably resign
if I would have only the king left, so I don't expect to encounter these
situations very often. However, I try to solve the problems without a chess
board which brings me to the limits of my current chess visualization
abilities: everything beyond the next move still feels troublesome. But by
not moving pieces during analysis I hope not only to improve my chess
endgame skills but also my board vision. And soon I will move on to things
like rook and bishop vs. rook endgames, a situation that is actually similar
to another correspondence chess game I am playing right now, which gets me
back to the question of "endgame"
in one of my correspondence chess games at ChessWorld.
From the comments to that post, I learned that my position at that time
should have been filed under middlegame and not endgame. The game
just finished with a loss for me: I gave my opponent the chance to play a
mate-in-three combination. This did not stop me from winning the tournament,
though. The image on the left shows the position before my final mistake.
White to move, what is the correct way to avoid mate? See the game for the move I played and the mate in three.
|
|
Last Updated ( Monday, 14 August 2006 )
|