| Studying chess endgames: how important are pawnless positions? |
|
|
|
| Written by Sciurus | |
| Sunday, 13 August 2006 | |
|
I finally started to study chess endgames and decided that it might be best to actually start at the beginning of the book (I am currently using Bruce Pandolfini's "Pandolfini's Endgame Course First of all, one might say that pawnless positions are much less complex than positions with pawns. Therefore, it cannot possibly take that much time to go through these introduction(?) chapters. To my surprise, it turned out that even in clearly won positions it can require accurate play to actually execute the win. As Blue Devil Knight also reported recently, examples such as K+B+N vs. K are definitely won but can be tricky to execute even for good players. Therefore, it takes a lot of time to
As mentioned above, it took me quite a while to comprehend Philidor's position. One of the reasons for my troubles studying these seemingly simple chess positions is that I am still not able to analyze variations longer than, say, 2 moves. In chess endgame positions, the number of possible moves is typically much lower than in typical Comments (1)
![]() ... written by likesforests, August 06, 2007
K Q vs K R can be very complex against a strong opponent or computer. GMs can and do foul it up.
Write comment
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.
|
|
| Last Updated ( Sunday, 27 August 2006 ) |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|





endgame
This week I decided to "graduate" from the elementary mates and to move on to the battle between heavy pieces. In general, the queen (white) wins against a single rook (black). However, black has drawing chances if she/he manages to keep the rook next to the king. Among the chess positions analyzed by and named after the chess master 
Play chess in style - 